RE: NETCONF over TLS

["Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>]

Looking from the AD perspective I have the same question. 

I would suggest that the NEE BOF includes this document on the agenda of
the meeting in Chicago, so that it can be discussed together with the
other proposals for NETCONF extensions, and the community can provide
feedback about its priority in the context of other work that needs to
be done. 

Dan


 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Balazs Lengyel
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 12:00 PM
> To: Netconf (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: NETCONF over TLS
> 
> Hello,
> Although we should treat all transports as equal and I have 
> no BIG problems with the draft, I remember that we had 
> problems with the Beep and SOAP transports as well to get 
> people to review and update the transport documents.
> Balazs
> 
> Andy Bierman wrote:
> 
> > There are some features waiting in line, like partial locks 
> and access 
> > control, and I don't think the priority of new transport 
> mapping work 
> > is very high.
> > 
> > Andy
> 
> -- 
> Balazs Lengyel                       Ericsson Hungary Ltd.
> TSP System Manager
> ECN: 831 7320                        Fax: +36 1 4377792
> Tel: +36-1-437-7320     email: Balazs.Lengyel@ericsson.com
> 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org 
> with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>