[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-farrel-rtg-manageability-requirements-00.txt



Dear authors,

Interesting idea. Here is my feedback
- It would be nice to have this "Manageability Considerations" section part of all protocol drafts.
- If this section is only composed of references to other documents (like MIBs), I think this is acceptable.
   If the documents are not yet published yet, a quick and simple description of what they should do is acceptable.
   The goal here is to try to keep this section easy-to-write and short: thinking about the manageability problems at the protocol design phase is already finding a beginning of a solution.
- You use the term manageability a lot. This is a generic term; it means different things to different persons.
A breakdown per FCAPS under the "Manageability Considerations" section would be nice. Or simply per FCAP, as the "security considerations" section is already taken care of.
For example.
Fault: the following notifications should be provided...
Configuration: out of the scope of this protocol
Accounting: a way of providing the following counters should be provided...
Performance: ...
Regards, Benoit.

[not sure if authors/and alex are on ops-area list, so I cc: them]

It is an interesting read.
I also know that various people think that we have too many "mandatory"
sections already. So how does that jive? Has the RTG community reacted 
already? In principle I think it would be good to have sections on
"Considerations for managebility".

I then wonder, why would this just apply to the docs from the RTG area?

W.r.t. sect 2.2, I am not sure I understand the differene between
the first 2 bullets.

W.r.t. sect 3.x, you may want to reference RFC3444.

Bert

  
-----Original Message-----
From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca@avaya.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 20:12
To: Ops-Area (E-mail)
Subject: FW: I-D
ACTION:draft-farrel-rtg-manageability-requirements-00.txt


 believe that this Internet-Draft is worth being read and 
commented by the OPS area. 

Regards,

Dan



-----Original Message-----
From: i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org 
[mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org]On Behalf Of 
Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
Sent: 12 October, 2004 10:05 PM
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-farrel-rtg-manageability-requirements-00.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line 
Internet-Drafts directories.


	Title		: Requirements for Manageability 
Sections in Routing
			  Area Drafts
	Author(s)	: A. Farrel, et al.
	Filename	: 
draft-farrel-rtg-manageability-requirements-00.txt
	Pages		: 6
	Date		: 2004-10-12
	
It has often been the case that manageability considerations have
   been retrofitted to protocols. This is sub-optimal.

   Similarly, new protocols or protocol extensions are frequently
   designed without due consideration of manageability requirements.

   This document specifies the requirement for all new Routing Area
   Internet-Drafts to include an "Manageability 
Considerations" section,
   and gives guidance on what that section should contain.

A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-farrel-rtg-manageabi
lity-requirements-00.txt

To remove yourself from the I-D Announcement list, send a message to 
i-d-announce-request@ietf.org with the word unsubscribe in 
the body of the message.  
You can also visit 
    
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/I-D-announce 
to change your subscription settings.


Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP. Login with the username
"anonymous" and a password of your e-mail address. After logging in,
type "cd internet-drafts" and then
	"get draft-farrel-rtg-manageability-requirements-00.txt".

A list of Internet-Drafts directories can be found in
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html 
or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt


Internet-Drafts can also be obtained by e-mail.

Send a message to:
	mailserv@ietf.org.
In the body type:
	"FILE /internet-drafts/draft-farrel-rtg-manageability-requirements-00.txt".
	
NOTE:	The mail server at ietf.org can return the document in
	MIME-encoded form by using the "mpack" utility.  To use this
	feature, insert the command "ENCODING mime" before the "FILE"
	command.  To decode the response(s), you will need "munpack" or
	a MIME-compliant mail reader.  Different MIME-compliant mail readers
	exhibit different behavior, especially when dealing with
	"multipart" MIME messages (i.e. documents which have been split
	up into multiple messages), so check your local documentation on
	how to manipulate these messages.
		
		
Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the
Internet-Draft.