RE: Draft Agenda (v1) for the Operations & Management Open Area Meeting IETF64

["David B Harrington" <ietfdbh@comcast.net>]

Hi,

The Syslog WG is considering a secure transport, and debating whether
to adopt SSH in common with the Netconf and ISMS or to adopt SSL.
Therefore,  convergence or non-convergence between Netconf and ISMS
might be important for them to consider.

Syslog is scheduled opposite the second half of the OpsArea meeting.

I recommend moving the discussion of Netconf/ISMS convergence to the
first half of the agenda, so syslog personnel can participate.

David Harrington
dbharrington@comcast.net

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ops-area@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-ops-area@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of David Kessens
> Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 9:13 PM
> To: Operations and Management Area
> Subject: Draft Agenda (v1) for the Operations & Management 
> Open Area Meeting IETF64
> 
> 
> Please see below for our first draft of the Operations & Management
> Open Area meeting.
> 
> Please let us know if you have any comments or additional 
> agenda items.
> 
> David Kessens & Bert Wijnen
> ---
> 
> Draft Agenda (v1) for the Operations & Management Open Area 
> Meeting IETF64
> 
> When:   1740-1950, MONDAY, November 7, 2005
> Where:  Salon 2/3
> 
> A. Administrative stuff
>    - appointment of scribe
>    - blue sheets
>    - agenda bashing
>    (David Kessens, Bert Wijnen)
> 
> B. Proposed working groups
> 
>    - AAA Maintenance
>      (John Loughney, speaker not yet confirmed)
>       
>    - Diffserv Control Plane Elements (DCPEl)
>      (Kathleen Nichols, Scott Bradner)
>      
>      mailing list: dcpel@ietf.org
>      
>      archive: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcpel
>    
>    - MAVS BOF proposal
>      (Martin Halstead)
> 
> C. SNMP/ISMS issues:
> 
>    - Overlap between SNMP+ISMS/NETCONF
>      (Simon Leinen & Andy Bierman - speakers not yet confirmed)
> 
>      Some people see potential in evolving NETCONF - which currently
>      focuses on configuration management - into a more general
network
>      management protocol, which would subsume much of what SNMP was
>      designed for. At the same time, the ISMS (Integrated Security
>      Mechanisms for SNMP) WG is converging towards the same
>      connection-oriented underlying transport (SSH) as NETCONF.
> 
>      Now seems to be a good time to think about the overlap between
>      SNMP+ISMS and NETCONF, and whether an effort should be 
> made in the
>      IETF at unifying the two.
>     
> ...
> 
> Y. Open Mike   
>    
> Z. AOB
> ---
> 
>