RE: More BCP: revenge of RS232 and CLIs

[Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>]

> I proposed 9600,n81 as a recommended standard, not higher, not lower,
> because having a SET baud rate and framing parameters that can be expected
> regardless of configuration state (or lack thereof) is useful.  Of all
> network hardware I have encountered, 9600,n81 is by far the most universal
> default.  I think I have a broad enough range of experience in that area
> to say that this constitutes a reasonable majority of the deployed
> equipment.

this is not the netconf wg, and this subject was a rathole there.
i fail to see how the baud rate, parity, color of cable, ...
affect security.  can we please get some focus here?

randy