[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: More BCP: revenge of RS232 and CLIs



Dan Hollis wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Owen DeLong wrote:

That all looks pretty good to me.  I would add one thing, however, and that is a
recommendation (not requirement) for the console to have some form of fall-back
authentication that does not require functioning IP or depend on external servers.
something like this:

n.n.n Non-IP Console Supports Independent Authentication

Requirement: The Non-IP console interface SHOULD support an authentication

I'd say s/SHOULD/MUST/ otherwise you get into chicken-egg scenarios.


Imagine how ridiculous it would be to try to configure IP on a cisco router, but not being able to get into the serial console because it required IP to be working before you could configure IP.

Excellent point, however, simply substituting MUST at that point will not solve that problem. Perhaps verbage to the effect that

"NON-IP console authentication MUST -not- be dependant
 upon IP configuration to function" would come closer to that goal.

There are word smiths better than I, for the verbage.

Have at it.

:)

.02c


-Dan