Re: Response to various comments from Russ Housley

[Chris Lonvick <clonvick@cisco.com>]

Hi George,

On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, George Jones wrote:

> > Date and Time: 2004-01-22, 10:45:13
> > Version: 03
> > Commented by: Housley, Russ
> > State before Comment: 0
> > State after Comment: 0
> > Comment:   Delete last sentence in Abstract.
> >
> >   Replace 'insure' with 'ensure' throughtout the document.
>
> OK. Done.  But http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=ensure
> claims that they are interchangable in most situations.

Consistency with other IETF documents is good.  RFC 2828 does not contain
the word "insure".

Later,
Chris

>
> >  The
> > document uses [PKCS.3.1993] as a reference for Diffie-Hellman.  It
> > should also reference RFC 2631.
>
> Done.
>
> > Use of '*must*' ought to be replaced with either 'must' or 'MUST'.
>
> The use of "*must*" in the justificaiton section was not a requirement
> per se.  Justification has been reworded without "must":
>
>    2.3.1 Support a 'Console' interface
>
>    Justification. There are times when it is operationally necessary
>    to be able to immediately and easily access a device for management
>    or configuration, even
>
> >  Delete the last paragraph of
>
> > Appendix B.  It begins: 'Version: $Id:'
>
> Gone.
>
> ---George Jones
>
>
>