Dear Falko,That would make sense for the I.Es. that clearly belong to a category.Dear Benoit, dear all, I agree to remove it from the *-info documents. Nevertheless, I think it should be moved to the forthcoming guidelines. Regards, Benoit. Cheers, Falko Benoit Claise wrote:Dear all, The IPFIX IE's have a property that's not directly displayed in the draft, except in the XML: "applicability". The history behind this "applicability" field is that it should have been used as a guideline, expressing whether a specific Information Element should be used in a data record, an option record or both of them. However, the property is used in [IPFIX-INFO] without any definition - except the values are "option", "data" and "all". While working on the PSAMP information elements, we concluded that this "applicability" field doesn't make sense anymore. 1. It's a guideline anyway, not a specification 2. It's present in the XML text only, while the non-XML text is the authoritative source 3. There are no definitions So the proposal is to remove this "applicability" field from both [IPFIX-INFO] and [PSAMP-INFO]. Feedback? Regards, Benoit. -- to unsubscribe send a message to psamp-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/psamp/> |