Re: Why RADIUS-EXT BOF???

[Richard Perlman <perl@lucent.com>]

Phil:

In addition to reading Bernard's well written reply, you should probably
also read the archives of this list to see the lengthily discussion
(including the question you have posed) that has already taken place.

> archive: http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/

Richard

On 11/5/03 09:51, "phil.neumiller@convergys.com"
<phil.neumiller@convergys.com> wrote:

> Hi folks,
> 
> I know I am late to this discussion, however why pursue RADIUS extensions
> when:
> 
> A).  Diameter has RFC's popping
> B).  Diameter solves most the serious issues with RADIUS
> C).  The Diameter designers strived to be backward compatible with RADIUS
> 
> The existence of this BOF, and any WG that results, will just further delay
> the
> wide scale deployment of Diameter which is clearly preferable.
> 
> Please let me know why?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Phil Neumiller


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>