RE: Bof at next IETF?

["Adrangi, Farid" <farid.adrangi@intel.com>]

I *totally* agree with John.  Since the last meeting, the group has
continued working on a number of drafts (that are within the scope of
the charter) based on the discussion/feedbacks on the mailing list.  So,
I don't understand why should not move forward with these drafts and
make progress.  
BR,
Farid

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bernard Aboba
> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 11:22 PM
> To: john.loughney@nokia.com
> Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Bof at next IETF?
> 
> 
> > I would have expected people to make more progress on some of the 
> > relevant drafts that were discussed in Minneapolis.  Having 
> a charter 
> > or WG shouldn't affect that work. I've been somewhat 
> suprised by the 
> > lack of progress.
> 
> Having an IETF WG doesn't make work happen.  The IETF can 
> merely bring together people interested in doing work.  The 
> first test of whether a WG makes sense is whether the group, 
> when brought together, actually does work.
> 
> 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to 
> radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in 
> a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>