RE: Bof at next IETF?

[Avi Lior <avi@bridgewatersystems.com>]

80 People showed up and the vast majority expressed an interest in forming a
WG.

Work has progressed in the meanwhile.  There is plenty of evidence that
there is interest.

There are a number of new drafts, and there are a number of revised draft.

Avi.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bernard Aboba [mailto:aboba@internaut.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 4:22 PM
> To: john.loughney@nokia.com
> Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Bof at next IETF?
> 
> 
> > I would have expected people to make more progress on some of the 
> > relevant drafts that were discussed in Minneapolis.  Having 
> a charter 
> > or WG shouldn't affect that work. I've been somewhat 
> suprised by the 
> > lack of progress.
> 
> Having an IETF WG doesn't make work happen.  The IETF can 
> merely bring together people interested in doing work.  The 
> first test of whether a WG makes sense is whether the group, 
> when brought together, actually does work.
> 
> 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to 
> radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in 
> a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>