RE: Bof at next IETF?

[Avi Lior <avi@bridgewatersystems.com>]

Dave Nelson said:

>While there was substantial support for moving forward with 
> RADIUS Extensions, there was equally substantial support for 
> the limited scope of changes to RADIUS as presented in the 
> draft charter.  I think we are making progress toward meeting 
> but we have a ways to go yet.

So this is great Dave.  So when is the BOF going to happen?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nelson, David [mailto:dnelson@enterasys.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 12:28 AM
> To: Parviz Yegani; Avi Lior; radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Bof at next IETF?
> 
> 
> Parviz Yegani writes...
>  
> > Given the strong support from the last IETF I thought 
> RADIUSEXT was on 
> > its way to become a new WG. What are we waiting for?
> 
> We are waiting for Internet Drafts, of suitable quality, that 
> fit within the proposed Charter, and volunteers to review 
> those drafts.
> 
> I have noticed a flurry of drafts coming out just prior to 
> the cutoff date for IEEE 59.  I would encourage all 
> interested parties to review these drafts, for protocol 
> quality, and also for compliance to the charter.  Please 
> review the drafts and submit commentary on this list.
> 
> While there was substantial support for moving forward with 
> RADIUS Extensions, there was equally substantial support for 
> the limited scope of changes to RADIUS as presented in the 
> draft charter.  I think we are making progress toward meeting 
> the requirement for suitable drafts, but we have a ways to go yet.
> 
> -- Dave
> 
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>