RE: Bof at next IETF?

[Avi Lior <avi@bridgewatersystems.com>]

John can you share with us what standard do you use to measure progress.

And can you please comment on how much work will be done if there wasn't a
working group vs. how much work will be done if there was a working group?

As well, in 58 8 to 10 people have agreed to do the majority of the work.
Is this not enough?


FYI:

Current partial listing(as obtained from the list)

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-adrangi-radius-extension-for-pwlan
-00.txt
This will be updated by deadline

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-adrangi-radiusext-location-informa
tion-00.txt
This is new work.

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-adrangi-radius-bandwidth-capabilit
y-00.txt
This is new work

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sterman-aaa-sip-01.txt
Updates previous one

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lonvick-sobgp-radius-03.txt

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nmcgill-l2tp-radius-ext-nas-port-0
1.txt

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-moskowitz-radius-client-kickstart-
01.txt

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-heinanen-radius-l2tp-vpls-00.txt

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-irtf-aaaarch-handoff-04.txt

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lior-radius-prepaid-extensions-02.
txt
This will be updated.

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lior-radius-udp-transport-mapping-
00.txt
This will be updated

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lior-radius-attribute-type-extensi
on-00.txt
This is new work but outside scope of charter.

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lior-radius-redirection-00.txt
This is new work

From IETF 58:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lior-radius-udp-transport-mapping-
00.txt

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-moskowitz-radius-client-kickstart-
01.txt

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-moskowitz-sspp-snmp-01.txt

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lior-radius-prepaid-extensions-02.
txt

http://www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-schulzrinne-sipping-radius-accounti
ng-00.txt

http://www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-sterman-aaa-sip-00.txt

http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/IEEE/draft-black-radius-lanedge-00.txt

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-aboba-context-802-00.txt

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-eap-keying-01.txt

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-adrangi-radius-issues-in-pwlan-roa
ming-01.txt

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-adrangi-radius-attributes-extensio
n-for-pwlan-00.txt

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nmcgill-l2tp-radius-ext-nas-port-0
1.txt

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-heinanen-radius-pe-discovery-04.tx
t


> -----Original Message-----
> From: john.loughney@nokia.com [mailto:john.loughney@nokia.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 1:12 PM
> To: pyegani@cisco.com; dromasca@avaya.com; 
> dnelson@enterasys.com; avi@bridgewatersystems.com; 
> radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Bof at next IETF?
> 
> 
> Hi Yegani,
> 
> > A number of drafts on Radius Extensions have been submitted
> for quite
> > sometime that need to be addressed in IETF soon. I'm not
> sure how this
> > could be done if the creation of the Radiusext WG is
> delayed further.
> > I thought we agreed at IETF58 in Minneapolis that RADIUSEXT was the
> > only home for these drafts, no?
> 
> I would have expected people to make more progress on some of
> the relevant 
> drafts that were discussed in Minneapolis.  Having a charter 
> or WG shouldn't affect that work. I've been somewhat suprised 
> by the lack of progress.
> 
> John
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>