RE: Bof at next IETF?

["Korhonen Jouni" <jouni.korhonen@teliasonera.com>]

Hi all,

I would second that there is interest for the work done in RADIUSEXT.
For example GSMA
would most probably like to see several of these worked on drafts
progress get eventually
done. Some of the next steps in global interoperator WLAN roaming
standardization work would
benefit (and is actually waiting for) on RADIUS extensions being drafted
in RADIUSEXT. For
example draft-adrangi-radius-extension-for-pwlan,
draft-adrangi-radiusext-location-information and
draft-adrangi-radius-chargeable-user-identity-attribute (which is worked
on in background
at the moment) are such to name few.

Best regards,
	Jouni

-- 
Jouni Korhonen - Senior Researcher
Emerging Technologies and Innovations
TeliaSonera Finland

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Avi Lior [mailto:avi@bridgewatersystems.com] 
> Sent: 12. helmikuuta 2004 2:22
> To: 'Bernard Aboba'; john.loughney@nokia.com
> Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Bof at next IETF?
> 
> 80 People showed up and the vast majority expressed an 
> interest in forming a
> WG.
> 
> Work has progressed in the meanwhile.  There is plenty of 
> evidence that
> there is interest.
> 
> There are a number of new drafts, and there are a number of 
> revised draft.
> 
> Avi.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bernard Aboba [mailto:aboba@internaut.com] 
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 4:22 PM
> > To: john.loughney@nokia.com
> > Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> > Subject: RE: Bof at next IETF?
> > 
> > 
> > > I would have expected people to make more progress on some of the 
> > > relevant drafts that were discussed in Minneapolis.  Having 
> > a charter 
> > > or WG shouldn't affect that work. I've been somewhat 
> > suprised by the 
> > > lack of progress.
> > 
> > Having an IETF WG doesn't make work happen.  The IETF can 
> > merely bring together people interested in doing work.  The 
> > first test of whether a WG makes sense is whether the group, 
> > when brought together, actually does work.
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > to unsubscribe send a message to 
> > radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in 
> > a single line as the message text body.
> > archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
> > 
> 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>