RE: RE: AAAEXT charter, Take 1

[<john.loughney@nokia.com>]

Kuntal,

> Why overloading RADIUSext with DIAMETER issues? If discussions
> happen separately, folks who have very little interest in pure 
> RADIUS won't have to deal with volumes of email on RADIUS.
> Take the example of Mobile IP WG. The WG was split into MIP6 and 
> MIP4 because it became too chaotic to manage and progress work
> on different disjoint threads.

Because MIPv4 and MIPv6 don't interwork in any current deployments.  
RADIUS and Diameter will need to interworking in many deployments.

John

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>