RE: Rationalizing the RADIUS data model

[<john.loughney@nokia.com>]

David,

> I would support adopting the "universal" data model for all attributes,
> including VSAs.  However, I suspect that the implementers who have
> enjoyed the vast freedom of "artistic expression" under the current VSA
> rules (basically none) would object.  It would likely make some existing
> VSAa non-compliant. 

I also support having a universal, standard model for attributes.  If 
folks have extended RADIUS in 'non-interoperable' ways, then it is their
'bad-luck' to have done so; I don't have a problem if these VSAs were
made non-compliant, because they really are not complying to anything
right now.

John

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>