RE: RADIUS V2

[Avi Lior <avi@bridgewatersystems.com>]

> > What happened between Charter 3,4 etc. (no new attribute types) and 
> > now? We should be asking these questions as well no?
> 
>   This is a good point.  I can see a proposed 
> Diameter-Message attribute carrying diameter attributes, and 
> not much more.  It can then be an opaque type to everyone who 
> doesn't use it.

As you would recall, I took a lot of heat for proposing an attribute that
was opaque to someone who doesn't use it.

In this case though "base RADIUS" does "break".  All end-points (final
RADIUS servers and clients) will have to parse this new attribute type. No?





--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>