[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Is it okay to break RADIUS? (was RADIUS V2)
At 04:25 PM 6/14/2004 -0400, Nelson, David wrote:
Avi Lior writes...
> Right now I don't buy that its okay to break RADIUS.
I don't think anyone is interested in breaking RADIUS. We still have
language in the charter requiring backwards compatibility with existing
RADIUS RFCs. We may have simply changed the threshold of what we mean
by "break".
Interesting. It seems that the charter now allows us to break Radius as
long as the
breakage point is below a certain threshold. How is this threshold defined
and by whom?
I will also observe that the changes in the pending charter that (a)
emphasize RADIUS/Diameter interoperability and migration, (b) encourage
rationalization of attribute data models and (c) require considerations
for complex data types, were introduced during the IESG review of the
charter. It is my understanding that these changes are not subject to
WG consensus.
So, are you saying that the IESG in its infinite wisdom is recommending that
we can break Radius to achieve (a)-(c) above?
-Parviz
-- Dave
--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>