RE: RFC 2865 compatibility

[Avi Lior <avi@bridgewatersystems.com>]

Bernard, Barney,

> 
> b) Respecify the attribute in a way that its use can be 
> negotiated and the RADIUS server can be guaranteed that if 
> sent and not understood, the right thing will happen (e.g. no 
> service will be granted to the user). There are proposals on 
> the table that provide for this (e.g. Jari's proposal for 
> extended attributes).

And also the capability exchange that is also on the table would help here.

Also note that the NAS may not support the extended attributes.
 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to 
> radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in 
> a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>