Comments for 2486bis WGLC

[<Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com>]

Hi,

Some minor comments about draft-arkko-roamops-rfc2486bis-02:

- In Section 2.1, on the line

   c           =/ %x2b    ; '*'              allowed

  the '*' in the comment should be '+'

- In Section 2.1, the line

   c           =/ %x5e-7e ; '^' - '          allowed

  would probably be easier to understand if written out:

   c           =/ %x5e    ; '^'              allowed
   c           =/ %x5f    ; '_'              allowed
   c           =/ %x60-7a ; 'a'-'z'          allowed
   c           =/ %x7b    ; '{'              allowed
   c           =/ %x7c    ; '|'              allowed
   c           =/ %x7d    ; '}'              allowed
   c           =/ %x7e    ; '~'              allowed

- In Appendix A, fourth bullet: it seems there are no 
  stricter requirements on the part preceding the '!' 
  sign _unless_ it's explicitly known that this realm 
  supports this syntax. 

  So it's not a backwards-compatibility problem: something 
  like "foo!bar@example.com" continues to be a valid NAI 
  (even though "foo" is not a valid realm) unless it's 
  known that example.com uses the stricter syntax
  from section 2.7.

Best regards,
Pasi

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>