Re: Comments for 2486bis WGLC

[Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>]

Pasi,

Thanks for your suggestions. I agree with them.

--Jari

> Some minor comments about draft-arkko-roamops-rfc2486bis-02:
>
> - In Section 2.1, on the line
>
>    c           =/ %x2b    ; '*'              allowed
>
>   the '*' in the comment should be '+'
>
> - In Section 2.1, the line
>
>    c           =/ %x5e-7e ; '^' - '          allowed
>
>   would probably be easier to understand if written out:
>
>    c           =/ %x5e    ; '^'              allowed
>    c           =/ %x5f    ; '_'              allowed
>    c           =/ %x60-7a ; 'a'-'z'          allowed
>    c           =/ %x7b    ; '{'              allowed
>    c           =/ %x7c    ; '|'              allowed
>    c           =/ %x7d    ; '}'              allowed
>    c           =/ %x7e    ; '~'              allowed
>
> - In Appendix A, fourth bullet: it seems there are no 
>   stricter requirements on the part preceding the '!' 
>   sign _unless_ it's explicitly known that this realm 
>   supports this syntax. 
>
>   So it's not a backwards-compatibility problem: something 
>   like "foo!bar@example.com" continues to be a valid NAI 
>   (even though "foo" is not a valid realm) unless it's 
>   known that example.com uses the stricter syntax
>   from section 2.7.



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>