RE: Request for Review: Chargeable User Identity (CUI)

[<john.loughney@nokia.com>]

Bernard,

I am working on some revised text. I should have this ready tomorrow, and perhaps
resubmit it next week.  Would it be more useful to do the consensus call
on the updated draft?

John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> [mailto:owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org]On Behalf Of ext Bernard Aboba
> Sent: 18 November, 2004 20:36
> To: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Request for Review: Chargeable User Identity (CUI)
> 
> 
> This is a request for RADEXT WG review of the document 
> "Chargeable User
> Identity", for the purpose of determining whether this document is
> suitable for becoming a RADEXT WG work item.  So far, the RADEXT WG
> response to the call for interest has been insufficient to 
> move forward
> on it. The document is available for inspection here:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-adrangi-radius-charg
> eable-user-identity-02.txt
> 
> The Request for Review will last until December 6, 2004.  If you
> believe this document is suitable as a RADEXT WG work item, please
> send email with "CUI: WG Work Item" in the subject.  If you 
> believe this
> document is unsuitable, please post email with "CUI: Reject" in the
> subject.  If you  have an Issue, please post it to the RADEXT 
> WG mailing list
> (radiusext@ops.ietf.org), using the format described in the 
> RADEXT Issues list:
> 
> http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/RADEXT/
> 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>