RE: Request for Review: Chargeable User Identity (CUI)

["Adrangi, Farid" <farid.adrangi@intel.com>]

As per our IETF discussion, John has volunteered to write up an
applicability section for the CUI draft - the idea is to make the
rationale for the CUI more clear.  So, John's suggestion is a good idea
*IF* most folks are not still convinced about the rationale for the CUI.

Farid

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of 
> john.loughney@nokia.com
> Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 1:12 PM
> To: aboba@internaut.com; radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Request for Review: Chargeable User Identity (CUI)
> 
> 
> Bernard,
> 
> I am working on some revised text. I should have this ready 
> tomorrow, and perhaps
> resubmit it next week.  Would it be more useful to do the 
> consensus call
> on the updated draft?
> 
> John
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> > [mailto:owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org]On Behalf Of ext Bernard Aboba
> > Sent: 18 November, 2004 20:36
> > To: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> > Subject: Request for Review: Chargeable User Identity (CUI)
> > 
> > 
> > This is a request for RADEXT WG review of the document 
> > "Chargeable User
> > Identity", for the purpose of determining whether this document is
> > suitable for becoming a RADEXT WG work item.  So far, the RADEXT WG
> > response to the call for interest has been insufficient to 
> > move forward
> > on it. The document is available for inspection here:
> > 
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-adrangi-radius-charg
> > eable-user-identity-02.txt
> > 
> > The Request for Review will last until December 6, 2004.  If you
> > believe this document is suitable as a RADEXT WG work item, please
> > send email with "CUI: WG Work Item" in the subject.  If you 
> > believe this
> > document is unsuitable, please post email with "CUI: Reject" in the
> > subject.  If you  have an Issue, please post it to the RADEXT 
> > WG mailing list
> > (radiusext@ops.ietf.org), using the format described in the 
> > RADEXT Issues list:
> > 
> > http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/RADEXT/
> > 
> > --
> > to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
> > the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> > archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
> > 
> 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>