[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RADEXT WG last call on RFC 2486bis

To: Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com>
Subject: Re: RADEXT WG last call on RFC 2486bis
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 21:24:34 +0200
Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.56.0411180949460.8597@internaut.com>
Organization: None
References: <Pine.LNX.4.56.0411180949460.8597@internaut.com>
Reply-to: jari.arkko@piuha.net
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040316

1) The correct draft version is -02, not -01. I posted
the pointer to the new version earlier to the list but did not
submit until today. Here are the pointers until it appears:

  http://www.arkko.com/publications/nai/draft-ietf-radext-rfc2486bis-02.txt
  http://www.arkko.com/publications/nai/draft-ietf-radext-rfc2486bis-02diff.html

2) Like Pasi, I'm a bit puzzled why we need another LC
on this document. We already had a last call and all
issues were resolved, the issue tracker does not show
anything remaining.

--Jari

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

References:
- RADEXT WG last call on RFC 2486bis
  - From: Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com>

Prev by Date: CUI: WG Work Item
Next by Date: RE: Progress on RADIUS Extension for Digest Authentication
Previous by thread: RADEXT WG last call on RFC 2486bis
Next by thread: RADEXT WG last call on RFC 2486bis-02
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread