[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Issue: RFC 2486bis - obsoletes or updates?

To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Subject: Re: Issue: RFC 2486bis - obsoletes or updates?
From: Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 06:36:44 -0800 (PST)
Cc: john.loughney@nokia.com, radiusext@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <41A1AEE3.4040302@piuha.net>
References: <3CF661B1787ABF41A869BE20108F8D6D432140@esebe056.ntc.nokia.com> <41A1AEE3.4040302@piuha.net>

> Hmm... RFC 2284bis at least had a line in the header that said
> something about obsoleting 2284. Checking for the XML command
> to do this... found from Henrik's 2284 draft... Ok, I'll add it.

Yes.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

References:
- Issue: RFC 2486bis - obsoletes or updates?
  - From: <john.loughney@nokia.com>
- Re: Issue: RFC 2486bis - obsoletes or updates?
  - From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Issue: RFC 2486bis - PPTP
Next by Date: Adoption of CUI as a RADEXT WG Work Item
Previous by thread: Re: Issue: RFC 2486bis - obsoletes or updates?
Next by thread: Issue: RFC 2486bis - PPTP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread