Re: Radius-Geopriv: Time-to-Live field

[Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>]

Tschofenig Hannes wrote:
> hi all, 
>
> jari commented that the draft currently lacks a clear definition of the term
> 'Time-to-Live'. 
>
> this element was introduced with the geopriv requirements document (see rfc
> 3693).  
>
> interestingly pdif-lo (see <draft-ietf-geopriv-pidf-lo-03.txt>) does not
> contain this field. 
>
> hence, we have two options: 
> a) remove the field to align radius-geopriv with pdif-lo
> b) add a reference to the geopriv requirements document  
>
> i suggest (after looking at the 'definition' of rfc 3693) to remove the
> field from the draft to have a better alignment with pdif-lo.  

This was not my original thought, but I'm fine with
this resolution. The less complex the protocol is,
the better...

--Jari


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>