RE: CUI - issues addressed in version 3

[Avi Lior <avi@bridgewatersystems.com>]

Hi John,

No. The lifetime of the CUI must be longer then the lifetime of the session.
Much longer.

But it would be defined by the SDO.

To summarize:
-The SDO will define the format of the CUI; and
-When the CUI is an opaque value, it will define how long it is valid for.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: john.loughney@nokia.com [mailto:john.loughney@nokia.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 11:13 PM
> To: farid.adrangi@intel.com; barney@databus.com
> Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: CUI - issues addressed in version 3
> 
> 
> Farid & Barney,
> 
> > First, don't you think the CUI format and configuration should be 
> > determined by the home network (i.e., NOT NAS or proxy)?  
> IMHO, as a 
> > developer, you should enable dynamic configuration for the CUI that 
> > meets the needs/requirements by various SDOs.  For example, 3gpp 
> > operator may set the lifetime to x value, where 3gpp2 
> operator sets it 
> > to y value through the dynamic configuration.
> 
> The lifetime will be determined by the home agent.  Other 
> SDOs are specifying values for the lifetime; however, perhaps 
> we could could include a default value that an operator or 
> SDO could override?
> 
> John
> 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to 
> radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in 
> a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>