[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Issue 83: CUI and re-authentication

To: "Glen Zorn (gwz)" <gwz@cisco.com>
Subject: RE: Issue 83: CUI and re-authentication
From: Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: "'Avi Lior'" <avi@bridgewatersystems.com>, john.loughney@nokia.com, farid.adrangi@intel.com, radiusext@ops.ietf.org, dnelson@enterasys.com
In-reply-to: <200504261604.j3QG4D54002538@ams-core-1.cisco.com>
References: <200504261604.j3QG4D54002538@ams-core-1.cisco.com>

> > This is just in case the NAS changed the value of CUI. It should
> > never do this.  But to be complete that clause says what will
> happen.
>
> Maybe this stuff could actually be explained in the draft?

That is the optimal way to get the point across, I think.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

References:
- RE: Issue 83: CUI and re-authentication
  - From: "Glen Zorn \(gwz\)" <gwz@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [eap] RE: [Isms] RADIUS is not a trusted third party
Next by Date: RE: [eap] RE: [Isms] RADIUS is not a trusted third party
Previous by thread: RE: Issue 83: CUI and re-authentication
Next by thread: Issue: 2486bis internationalization and unassigned codepoints
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread