[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [eap] RE: [Isms] RADIUS is not a trusted third party

To: David B Harrington <ietfdbh@comcast.net>
Subject: RE: [eap] RE: [Isms] RADIUS is not a trusted third party
From: Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:33:23 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: "'Blumenthal, Uri'" <uri.blumenthal@intel.com>, gwz@cisco.com, radiusext@ops.ietf.org, eap@frascone.com, isms@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <200504261827.j3QIRcS27781@internaut.com>
References: <200504261827.j3QIRcS27781@internaut.com>

> Why are we spending so much time discussing EAP, if the AD has told
> the WG that EAP should not be used, and that the IESG is unlikely to
> approve a solution using EAP?
>
> dbh

Perhaps because the ISMS WG charter talks about RADIUS support?

Just a thought :)

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

Prev by Date: RE: Issue 83: CUI and re-authentication
Next by Date: L2 NAS-Filter-Rule syntax choices
Previous by thread: RE: [eap] RE: [Isms] RADIUS is not a trusted third party
Next by thread: RE: [eap] RE: [Isms] RADIUS is not a trusted third party
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread