Re: Proposed Resolution to Issue 87 (RADIUS MIB Updates)

[Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com>]

Question:  How does this work for NASes that support both IPv4 and IPv6?
Which objects would such devices use?

On Wed, 11 May 2005, Nelson, David wrote:

> Since the discussion of this issue has subsided, with no WG members
> dissenting from the MIB Doctor's recommendations, I propose to
> incorporate those recommendations into the next revision of the drafts.
>
> In summary, the drafts will contain the tables from RFCs 2618-2621 with
> the IPv4-only format address objects changed from "current" to
> "deprecated".  New tables will be added (in parallel) with IPv4/IPv6
> format address objects.  To promote backwards compatibility, the
> compliance statements will require both old and new tables to be
> instantiated when IPv4 addresses are in use, and only the new tables
> when IPv4 addresses are not in use (i.e. IPv6 only).
>
> The new RFCs, when issued, will either Update or Obsolete RFCs
> 2618-2621, as appropriate.
>
>
>
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
>

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>