RE: Status of RADEXT Issues 115 and 116

["Sanchez, Mauricio (PNB Roseville)" <mauricio.sanchez@hp.com>]

Dave scribbled... 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Nelson, David
> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 2:18 PM
> To: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Status of RADEXT Issues 115 and 116
> 
> All the items included in RADEXT Issues 115 and 116 have been 
> resolved in the draft-ietf-radext-ieee802-01.txt revision, 
> with the exception of:
> 
>     The term "terminal" is not defined in the draft. I suspect
>     it identifies the network entity which contains the IEEE 
>     802.1X Supplicant function, but this should perhaps be 
>     clarified.
> 
> This issue still exists in the -01 draft, in Section 2.5.

Yes, this is know.  On 1/10/06 I wrote in response to your issue: 

"[ms] This sentence comes by way of the IPFilterRule description found
in Diameter [RFC3588].  What would you suggest we do for RADIUS? Is
terminal not a globally known term in RADIUS, if not, is there any?
Perhaps can you suggest a definition to add to the terminology section.
"

I await your response.

Cheers,
MS

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>