[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Issue: References
Bernard points out...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> [mailto:owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bernard Aboba
> Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 12:15 PM
> To: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Issue: References
>
> Issue : References
> Submitter names: Bernard Aboba
> Submitter email address: aboba@internaut.com Date first
> submitted: January 29, 2006
> Reference:
> Document: IEEE 802-01
> Comment type: Editorial
> Priority: S
> Section: Various
> Rationale/Explanation of issue:
>
> It is not clear to me why RFC 2868, 3162, 3576, 3579, 3580,
> 3748 are listed as Normative References. For example, an
> implementer would not be required to consult these documents
> in order to implement the specification.
We agree and will change the references from normative to informative.
>
> On the other hand, it seems like RFC 2674 and 3629 are
> referenced in a normative way; for example, if UTF-8 is
> supported, then an implementer would need to consult RFC
> 3629, no? The reference to IEEE 802 also seems to be normative.
We agree and will change the references from informative to normative.
>
> Some of the references do not appear to be referenced in the
> specification.
> For example, there is no reference to RFC 1321, RFC 2866, RFC
> 2867, RFC 3748.
Good catch. This are remnants of previous drafts. This will be removed.
Cheers,
MS
--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>