[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New Technical Issues RE: WG last call in progress on VLAN/Priority Draft
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 02:42:42PM -0500, Alan DeKok wrote:
> Barney Wolff <barney@databus.com> wrote:
> > It seems to me that what's wrong with the attribute is not so much
> > whether it should be called integer or string, but that it is a
> > misuse (or clever hack) of the tag field to have semantic value.
>
> But it's not a RADIUS tag field. It's meaning has no correlation
> with the tag fields of RADIUS tagged attributes, because those tags
> have values 1..0x1f. Instead, it's using a VLAN tag.
Oops. Sorry, I misremembered the set of valid tag values. So my
comments are largely nonsensical.
Barney
--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>