Re: Review of draft-ietf-radext-vlan-02.txt

[Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>]

Hi Mauricio,

thanks for responding to this issue. Please find my response below:

> > > your new text proposal looks much better.
> > >
> > > You need to modify Section 3 as well:
> > >
> > > "
> > >  Access-   Access-  Access-  Access-    CoA-
> > >   Request   Accept   Reject   Challenge  Req    #   Attribute
> > >     0        0-1      0        0         0-1   TBD  
> >
> > User-Priority-Table
> >
> > > "
> >
> > Got it.   BTW, do you think that *any* of the attributes are 
> > appropriate for 
> > inclusion in an Accounting-Request?
>
>
> An argument to allow these attributes in an Accounting-Request is for
> forensic purposes.  The accounting server is already aggregating a
> number of session characteristics (packet/byte counts) and allowing
> attributes from the vlan draft would shed additional light on the what
> specific services the user was consuming/using at a given point in time.
Assume that you carry the User-Priority-Table within Accounting-Request 
messages. Do you think that it provides information how many packets are 
carried for each individual QoS class? Where is the information that 
offers me the following info:
- # packets/bytes for user priority 0
....
- # packets/bytes for user priority 7

Ciao
Hannes

> Cheers,
> MS

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>