RE: Review of draft-ietf-radext-vlan-02.txt

["Sanchez, Mauricio (ProCurve)" <mauricio.sanchez@hp.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bernard Aboba
> Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2006 7:14 PM
> To: Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net
> Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Review of draft-ietf-radext-vlan-02.txt
> 
> 
> >your new text proposal looks much better.
> >
> >You need to modify Section 3 as well:
> >
> >"
> >   Access-   Access-  Access-  Access-    CoA-
> >    Request   Accept   Reject   Challenge  Req    #   Attribute
> >      0        0-1      0        0         0-1   TBD  
> User-Priority-Table
> >"
> 
> Got it.   BTW, do you think that *any* of the attributes are 
> appropriate for 
> inclusion in an Accounting-Request?

An argument to allow these attributes in an Accounting-Request is for
forensic purposes.  The accounting server is already aggregating a
number of session characteristics (packet/byte counts) and allowing
attributes from the vlan draft would shed additional light on the what
specific services the user was consuming/using at a given point in time.


Cheers,
MS

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>