Jouni recommended... > -----Original Message----- > From: jouni.korhonen@teliasonera.com > [JiK] Yes. Is there a particular reason to add a trailing rule-delim if > there is only a single rule? If not maybe the example below would work: > > rule-list = rule > rule-list =/ rule-list rule-delim rule > rule = "v1" " " (flush-rule / permit-all-rule > / l2-filter-rule / l2-tunnel-rule > / ip-filter-rule / ip-tunnel-rule > / http-filter-rule / http-redir-rule) Yes, your syntax saves one whole octet :), but is the complexity merited? Can we just go with my proposal? It would keep the general rule syntax consistent. MS
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature