RE: Continued discussion of RADIUS Crypto-Agility

["Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glen Zorn (gwz) [mailto:gwz@cisco.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 11:07 PM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); David B. Nelson
> Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Continued discussion of RADIUS Crypto-Agility
> 
> Romascanu, Dan (Dan) <mailto:dromasca@avaya.com> allegedly 
> scribbled on Wednesday, August 01, 2007 10:12 AM:
> 
> ...
> 
> > Seriously, I was the one to recommend the author to ask for a time 
> > slot on the RADEXT agenda. I believe that the RADSEC work is if not 
> > within at least related to the WG scope (but not necessarily as a 
> > crypto-agility solution), although undertaking it would mean an 
> > extension of the charter.
> 
> OK, I'm confused: the scope of a WG is _not_ defined by its 
> charter?  If the charter doesn't define the scope of a WG, what does?
> 

Yes, at the same time Working Group meetings and mail lists can discuss
items that are candidates for future work. This includes items that do
not belong strictly within a current charter, but may become part of an
extended charter later. 

Dan

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>