[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Continued discussion of RADIUS Crypto-Agility


 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Leif Johansson
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 10:42 AM
> To: Bernard Aboba
> Cc: stefan.winter@restena.lu; radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Continued discussion of RADIUS Crypto-Agility
> 
> Bernard Aboba wrote:
> >> The wg should (imho) explicitly state if the issue is 
> getting rid of 
> >> MD5 or getting rid of MD5 at the same time as a whole 
> bunch of other 
> >> things are done. That will probably make this process go a 
> whole lot 
> >> easier.
> >
> > David has posted the set of requirements that a solution needs to 
> > meet.  Beyond those, the WG can also take into account 
> other desirable 
> > security characteristics in making a determination.
> >
> Draft?

There is no I-D if this is what you are asking about, but the
requirements were set in the following message from the WG co-chair: 

https://ops.ietf.org/lists/radiusext/2007/msg00185.html

Dan

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>