[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Request for Review: "Issues and Fixes" changes -- Call-Check.
Avi Lior writes...
> > I would suggest MUST for Authorize-Only and MAY for Call-Check.
>
> [Avi] I agree with David. I am not buying even the MAY for Call-
> Check. But I can live with it.
Based on the discussion so far, acknowledging that Call-Check is
pre-authentication (not in the 802.11i key-caching sense, but in a
pre-screening sense, you don't have my credentials yet), I think that even
MAY is stretching the point. Can anyone describe a use case for Call-Check
in which the NAS would have a State attribute from an existing user session
or ongoing authentication sequence?
--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>