Extended attributes support for structured data (was RE: Consideration of draft-lior-radius-attribute-type-extension-02.txt)

["David B. Nelson" <dnelson@elbrysnetworks.com>]

Glen Zorn writes...

> Actually, it does (as illustrated in the examples), it's just not
> very explicit about it.

Right.  I certainly missed it.

> ...the problem with "subattributes" as described in RFC 2865 is
> that they must fit in a single VSA.  With this draft, we open up 
> the possibility (with the "continuation" bit) of having really huge
> attributes containing subattributes that themselves are larger than
> a single VSA.  It seems like we either need to restrict the usage
> of subattributes or decide on one or the other.

One or the other what?  Could you please elaborate?



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>