RE: request to recharter

["Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>]

Klaas Wierenga <mailto:klaas@wierenga.net> scribbled on Thursday,
February 14, 2008 3:32 PM:

...

> 
> Nobody expects the IETF to just rubberstamp this work, on the
> contrary, this is an effort to sollicit comments and make this better
> than it would be if it was just thought up by a few individuals. 

I'm extremely pleased to hear that!  For example, I'm inclined to think
that TLSoSCTP might be a choice far less destructive of RADIUS semantics
that TLSoTCP...

> We
> have built an infrastructure on what was available and ran into
> operational problems with it, I  believe it is perfectly legitimate
> to try to address these problems.     

No doubt.  The only question is where & how.  I strongly believe that
the radext WG is not the right place,\. The IETF standardization process
may be the "how"; the normal way this is discovered is through the BOF
process.

> 
> Klaas Wierenga
> (creator of eduroam)


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>