[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Meaning of "backward compatible" WAS RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter

To: <radiusext@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Meaning of "backward compatible" WAS RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
From: "David B. Nelson" <d.b.nelson@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 08:46:43 -0400
In-reply-to: <006601c8a1ed$48962660$65e4787c@arubanetworks.com>
References: <BLU137-DS3201313A440BD95347E3B93E80@phx.gbl> <01c201c89e64$259ca440$1f0a0a0a@xpsuperdvd2> <001601c89ea3$12f2f7b0$33da787c@arubanetworks.com> <200804150800.53961.stefan.winter@restena.lu> <004001c89ed0$d8b0f100$33da787c@arubanetworks.com> <48046B45.20008@deployingradius.com> <007501c89f8c$57c0f380$99e0787c@arubanetworks.com> <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A04B082B7@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com> <BLU137-W3582AC60B8DE34F3A13CD93EA0@phx.gbl> <007d01c89f9a$adb6d6c0$99e0787c@arubanetworks.com> <029d01c89fe3$a60d4820$1f0a0a0a@xpsuperdvd2> <400A74A604718E46BC9EE95677BAFF31181A2B@wv-mailsrv2.strixsystems.com> <029e01c89fea$5f2eb7c0$1f0a0a0a@xpsuperdvd2> <400A74A604718E46BC9EE95677BAFF31181A3C@wv-mailsrv2.strixsystems.com> <029f01c89fec$b9f8d5d0$1f0a0a0a@xpsuperdvd2> <000001c8a048$450e3e70$9ae4787c@arubanetworks.com> <034d01c8a0d8$6652ed70$1f0a0a0a@xpsuperdvd2> <006601c8a10c$aa26ad00$6ce2787c@arubanetworks.com> <039601c8a164$fd337a70$1f0a0a0a@xpsuperdvd2> <006601c8a1ed$48962660$65e4787c@aruban etworks.com>

Glen Zorn writes...

> The first thing to be addressed is the (bogus) usage of the term
> "backward compatibility" in the proposed charter.  PLEASE replace it
> with "interoperable" or a synonym thereof.

With all due respect, this seems to me like another "name game" issue.
Let's worry more about what we want the properties to be, and less about
what we call it



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Meaning of "backward compatible" WAS RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
  - From: "Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>

References:
- Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
  - From: <Bernard_Aboba@hotmail.com>
- RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
  - From: "David B. Nelson" <dnelson@elbrysnetworks.com>
- RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
  - From: "Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>
- Re: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
  - From: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu>
- RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
  - From: "Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>
- Re: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
  - From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
- Meaning of "backward compatible" WAS RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
  - From: "Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>
- RE: Meaning of "backward compatible" WAS RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
  - From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
- RE: Meaning of "backward compatible" WAS RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
  - From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
- RE: Meaning of "backward compatible" WAS RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
  - From: "Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>
- RE: Meaning of "backward compatible" WAS RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
  - From: "David B. Nelson" <dnelson@elbrysnetworks.com>
- RE: Meaning of "backward compatible" WAS RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
  - From: "Matt Holdrege" <Matt.Holdrege@strixsystems.com>
- RE: Meaning of "backward compatible" WAS RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
  - From: "David B. Nelson" <dnelson@elbrysnetworks.com>
- RE: Meaning of "backward compatible" WAS RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
  - From: "Matt Holdrege" <Matt.Holdrege@strixsystems.com>
- RE: Meaning of "backward compatible" WAS RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
  - From: "David B. Nelson" <dnelson@elbrysnetworks.com>
- RE: Meaning of "backward compatible" WAS RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
  - From: "Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>
- RE: Meaning of "backward compatible" WAS RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
  - From: "David B. Nelson" <dnelson@elbrysnetworks.com>
- RE: Meaning of "backward compatible" WAS RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
  - From: "Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>
- RE: Meaning of "backward compatible" WAS RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
  - From: "David B. Nelson" <dnelson@elbrysnetworks.com>
- RE: Meaning of "backward compatible" WAS RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
  - From: "Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>

Prev by Date: RE: Meaning of "backward compatible" WAS RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
Next by Date: RE: Meaning of "backward compatible" WAS RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
Previous by thread: RE: Meaning of "backward compatible" WAS RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
Next by thread: RE: Meaning of "backward compatible" WAS RE: Consensus Call on RADEXT WG re-charter
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread