[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Help me about RFC3576

To: <bhcuong2005@yahoo.com>, <radiusext@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Help me about RFC3576
From: "Murtaza Chiba (mchiba)" <mchiba@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:43:59 -0700
In-reply-to: <771596.32561.qm@web35102.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <771596.32561.qm@web35102.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

Included radius extensions WG. Not sure what was decided in the bis portion.

Thanks,

-Murtaza

From: Cuong Hoang Bui [mailto:bhcuong2005@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 1:11 PM
To: Murtaza Chiba (mchiba)
Subject: Help me about RFC3576

Dear Mr. Chiba,

I have a question related to CoA messages.
If both supported attribute(s) and unsupported attribute(s) are included in CoA-Request message, then what happens? NAS doesn't process packets and return CoA-NAK back to Radius server or it processes only supported attributes, but should it send CoA-NAK or CoA-ACK back to RADIUS server?

Thank you

Regards
Cuong

Prev by Date: RE: Comments on "Crypto-Agility Requirements for RADIUS"
Next by Date: Re: REMINDER: RADEXT WG Last call on "Extended RADIUS Attributes"
Previous by thread: Subject: I-D Action:draft-tiwari-radext-tunnel-type-01.txt (fwd)
Next by thread: Issue 250
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread