[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: no overall type in Extended Attributes

To: Glen Zorn <glenzorn@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: no overall type in Extended Attributes
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 17:59:10 +0200
Cc: 'radext mailing list' <radiusext@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <002101c909f7$5a964760$0fc2d620$@net>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0808131912120.24114@internaut.com> <000801c8fe00$b50248a0$1f06d9e0$@net> <003a01c907fc$7c437b00$74ca7100$@net> <48B4F3CA.7020901@deployingradius.com> <004701c90820$5ce75550$16b5fff0$@net> <48B51378.2040100@deployingradius.com> <004c01c90822$8f7612c0$ae623840$@net> <48B518C2.6020609@deployingradius.com> <005001c90826$8bfd69f0$a3f83dd0$@net> <48B53CCC.8050505@deployingradius.com> <007101c90846$965add40$c31097c0$@net> <48B5645D.7050202@deployingradius.com> <00a601c90913$f27767b0$d7663710$@net> <48B6AF7C.9000004@deployingradius.com> <002101c909f7$5a964760$0fc2d620$@net>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724)

Glen Zorn wrote:
> Right.  The example is related to security...anyway, here's an idea: how
> about breaking the Ext-Type field into 2 8-bit fields one of which stays in
> the Extended Attribute header (giving naming capability for the attribute
> itself) & the other staying in the TLV header?  

  Are we back to 8-bit types for the Extended-Attribute?

  Alan DeKok.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

Follow-Ups:
- RE: no overall type in Extended Attributes
  - From: "Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>

References:
- Re: no overall type in Extended Attributes
  - From: Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com>
- RE: no overall type in Extended Attributes
  - From: "Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>
- RE: no overall type in Extended Attributes
  - From: "Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>
- Re: no overall type in Extended Attributes
  - From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
- RE: no overall type in Extended Attributes
  - From: "Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>
- Re: no overall type in Extended Attributes
  - From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
- RE: no overall type in Extended Attributes
  - From: "Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>
- Re: no overall type in Extended Attributes
  - From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
- RE: no overall type in Extended Attributes
  - From: "Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>
- Re: no overall type in Extended Attributes
  - From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
- RE: no overall type in Extended Attributes
  - From: "Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>
- Re: no overall type in Extended Attributes
  - From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
- RE: no overall type in Extended Attributes
  - From: "Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>
- Re: no overall type in Extended Attributes
  - From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
- RE: no overall type in Extended Attributes
  - From: "Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>

Prev by Date: New version of encrypted attributes draft
Next by Date: RE: no overall type in Extended Attributes
Previous by thread: RE: no overall type in Extended Attributes
Next by thread: RE: no overall type in Extended Attributes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread