RE: AD review of draft-ietf-radext-management-authorization-05.txt

["Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of David B. Nelson
> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 12:55 AM
> To: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: AD review of 
> draft-ietf-radext-management-authorization-05.txt
> 
> Dan Romascanu writes...
> 
> > The question is whether an encrypted channel with no 
> authentication or 
> > integrity makes sense.
> 
> The answer from several WG members with expertise in this 
> area was that encrypted messages without message integrity do 
> not make sense.
> 
> Please see my previous message about disambiguating the term 
> "authentication" as used in RADIUS from the term 
> "authentication" as used in SNMP.
> 

Yes, I got it now. The clarification proposed in the exchange of
messages between you and Juergen would be fine. 

Dan

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>