[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: AD review of draft-ietf-radext-management-authorization-05.txt

On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 07:48:41AM -0400, David B. Nelson wrote:
> Juergen Schoenwaelder writes...
> 
> > This explanation perfectly makes sense and I am in favour of adding
> > clarifying text.
> 
> OK, great.  I was suggesting that we add that text to the ISMS RADIUS Usage
> draft, as that's where SNMP-specific discussion belongs.  Just to clarify,
> is that what you are in favor of?  Or do you think it needs to [also] be in
> the RADIUS Management Authorization draft?

I think a one sentence explanation that authentication is assumed to
be always provided by this all happening in the RADIUS context might
be generally useful where we talk about Management-Transport-Protection.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>