[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: RADIUS Calling-Station-Id for WiMAX
- To: "David B. Nelson" <dnelson@elbrysnetworks.com>, 'Alan DeKok' <aland@deployingradius.com>, 'Matt Holdrege' <Matt.Holdrege@strixsystems.com>
- Subject: RE: RADIUS Calling-Station-Id for WiMAX
- From: Avi Lior <avi@bridgewatersystems.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 13:39:01 -0400
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Cc: 'Mike Bean' <bean@alcatel-lucent.com>, "'David B. Nelson'" <d.b.nelson@comcast.net>, 'Glen Zorn' <glenzorn@comcast.net>, 'Ray Bell' <ray@grid-net.com>, 'Bernard Aboba' <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>, "'Congdon, Paul T (ProCurve)'" <paul.congdon@hp.com>, "radiusext@ops.ietf.org" <radiusext@ops.ietf.org>, 'Dan Romascanu' <dromasca@avaya.com>
- In-reply-to: <608C46E7749B41D58F99FEA873B030F3@xpsuperdvd2>
- References: <A0941C2137BCA349AA3D32CDA3AEBCA11868B8@tuna.grid-net.com> <000601c9136c$a48adf10$eda09d30$@net> <8A8CFE8F89C38B41A749C19328C76D6308A47A7662@exchange02.bridgewatersys.com> <685F3FC2BA114A07BBED15A9766D544E@NEWTON603> <48C93147.5060103@alcatel-lucent.com> <400A74A604718E46BC9EE95677BAFF316AE209@wv-mailsrv2.strixsystems.com> <48C9468A.90000@deployingradius.com> <8A8CFE8F89C38B41A749C19328C76D6308A47A76A6@exchange02.bridgewatersys.com> <608C46E7749B41D58F99FEA873B030F3@xpsuperdvd2>
Not as far as my understanding goes. In 802.5 and 802.6 the MAC address is bit reversed over the wire.
> In my experience, application layer protocols such as RADIUS
> always deal with data in host order.
I think you maybe wrong about that. It should be network order because host order is not deterministic.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David B. Nelson [mailto:dnelson@elbrysnetworks.com]
> Sent: September 11, 2008 1:23 PM
> To: Avi Lior; 'Alan DeKok'; 'Matt Holdrege'
> Cc: 'Mike Bean'; 'David B. Nelson'; 'Glen Zorn'; 'Ray Bell';
> 'Bernard Aboba'; 'Congdon, Paul T (ProCurve)';
> radiusext@ops.ietf.org; 'Dan Romascanu'
> Subject: RE: RADIUS Calling-Station-Id for WiMAX
>
> > The MAC over-the-wire is different for different technogologies.
> > 802.3 and 802.4 send the bits with the least siginificant
> bit first,
> > while 802.5 and 802.6 send the most significant bit first.
>
> Isn't this just the "host order" vs. "network order" issue?
>
>
>
--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>