RE: Issue 272 resolution

["Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>]

Alan DeKok [mailto:aland@deployingradius.com] wrights:

> Glen Zorn wrote:
> > Look at RFC 2548, in particular the MS-CHAP*-Response, MS-CHAP-CPW-?,
> etc.
> > attributes.  Those are perfect examples of what cannot be done with
> Extended
> > Attributes as currently defined.
> 
>   They can be carried in legacy RADIUS.  The extended types are just
> legacy RADIUS attributes with 16-bit types.

No, they aren't, Extended Attributes are a slight extension of RFC 2865
VSAs.

...



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>