Re: Bang-path routing

[Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>]

Korhonen, Jouni /TeliaSonera Finland Oyj wrote:
> This is definitely an intresting and usefull discussion. As
> 3GPP/WiMAX seems to be referenced ;) could you, for my education,
> also point out who belong to future "who else/no one"?

  I'm afraid I can't parse that sentence.

> What amount of subcribers are expected to be there?

  "Expected"?  I thought I had made it clear that *current* network
providers dislike the prefix/suffix/bangpath routing.  All of them.

  There was a GRWG call a few weeks ago where this idea was discussed.
The overwhelming majority of people on the call agreed with the summary
I've presented here.

  Perhaps you could explain why you're talking about "future" and
"expected" subscribers when my messages referred to current networks,
and to the traditional methods they used for AAA roaming.

  Alan DeKok.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>