RE: Bang-path routing

[<jouni.korhonen@teliasonera.com>]

Hi Alan,

> 
> Korhonen, Jouni /TeliaSonera Finland Oyj wrote:
> > This is definitely an intresting and usefull discussion. As
> > 3GPP/WiMAX seems to be referenced ;) could you, for my education,
> > also point out who belong to future "who else/no one"?
> 
>   I'm afraid I can't parse that sentence.

I was just curious to know who are involved in addition to mentioned
3GPP/WiMAX. "All" and "no one" did not say much at least to me. Did
you refer to a group of roaming network providers or some consortiums?

> > What amount of subcribers are expected to be there?
> 
>   "Expected"?  I thought I had made it clear that *current* network
> providers dislike the prefix/suffix/bangpath routing.  All of them.

Ok. My mistake.

>   There was a GRWG call a few weeks ago where this idea was discussed.
> The overwhelming majority of people on the call agreed with 
> the summary
> I've presented here.

Ok. Good to know.

>   Perhaps you could explain why you're talking about "future" and
> "expected" subscribers when my messages referred to current networks,
> and to the traditional methods they used for AAA roaming.

As noted above I wasn't clear with the "current" part. Anyway, my
interpretation
of "Many WiFi operators have WiMAX spectrum.  And they are pushing
strongly for
the same solution to apply to both arenas." was that some of the planned
roaming
environment is not functional as we speak.. thus my "future".
Sorry if I confused you :)

Jouni

> 
>   Alan DeKok.
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>