RE: Cmts on ExtAttrs-05

["Glen Zorn" <glenzorn@comcast.net>]

Greg Weber [mailto:gdweber@gmail.com] writes:

...

> A couple editorial comments on the current (-05) extended attributes
> draft:
> 
> Section 5, under More bit description:
>    "exceeds 246 octets" -> "exceeds 245 octets"

Fixed.

> Section 5, under Ext-Len description:
>   ">=3." -> ">=4."

Fixed.

> Figure 3: the second Ext-Type's value:
>   "(0x00" -> "(0x01)"

Fixed.

> Figure 4: I think the very last two octet values swapped.

Fixed.

> Figure 4: The third attribute in this figure violates this earlier
> MUST from section 4:

Yup.  Anybody happen to remember whose idea it was to put that restriction
in place?

>   "If an Extended Attribute contains more than one TLV then all of the
> encapsulated
>   TLVs MUST fit completely within the Extended Attribute."
>   Not sure if this is a problem with the text or the example -or maybe
> just wording.


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>